Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order refusing a new trial. George E. Church, Judge. .The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The defendants are the Southern Pacific Company and certain of its employees in the charge and operation of a switch engine with the ears thereto attached, by which the injuries were,inflicted. The verdict of the jury was in favor of the plaintiff against all of the defendants. The appeal from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial is taken by all of the defendants.
The question most earnestly and elaborately argued by all the parties to this appeal is whether or not the evidence establishes the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Treadwell v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by247 opinions
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.