Lahti v. McMenamin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Plaintiff, while crossing East 12th Street near its intersection with 22d Avenue, in the city of Oakland, was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant. As a result of the collision she received bodily injuries, and thereafter instituted this action to recover damages for the injuries so sustained. The defendant, as a defense to plaintiff’s action, set up contributory negligence on plaintiff’s part as the proximate cause of her said in juries, and alleged that “while plaintiff was at all times south of the center line of East 12th street, plaintiff carelessly, recklessly, and without…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CarnahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Alabama & V. Ry. Co. v. DennisMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Barrera v. De La TorreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Beagle v. VasoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Tanner v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1934
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.