Legal Opinion

Neal v. Hunt

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1975No. 11729PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from an injunction granted by the Superior Court of Mohave County which limited defendants, Claude and Rita Neal, and the Truxton Canyon Water Company, Inc., to taking no more than three hundred gallons of water per minute from certain water wells located on property owned by them in the Truxton wash area, thirty miles east of Kingman, Arizona.

We must answer the following questions on appeal:

1. Is the unrecorded agreement made in 1957 between defendants and plaintiffs’ predecessor limiting the amount of water which could be used by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Davis v. KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Rothrauff Et Ux. v. Sinking Spr. W. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Howard v. PerrinArizona Supreme Court · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shalimar Ass'n v. D.O.C. Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. In re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water In the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Warren v. Whitehall Income Fund 86Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Chesney v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API