Legal Opinion
In re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water In the Gila River System & Source
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1993No. Nos. WC-90-0001-IR, WC-90-0001-IR to WC-90-0007-IR and WC-79-0001 to WC-79-0004PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
This appeal presents the second of six issues accepted for interlocutory review on December 11, 1991. We decide today whether the trial court erred in adopting a test to determine whether the underground water known as subflow is appropriable under A.R.S. § 45-141. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 45-252 and Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case is a consolidated general adjudication brought under A.R.S. § 45-251 et seq. to determine the extent and priority of the rights of all persons to use water in the Gila River system and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Ariz.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. District Court in & for the County of EagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & SourceArizona Supreme Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.