Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
Southwest Cotton Company, a corporation, and Valley Ranch Company, a corpora tion, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought suit against Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1, a corporation, Beardsley Land & Investment Company, a corporation, and Carl Pleasant, hereinafter called defendants, for the purpose of enjoining the latter from storing and using for irrigation certain surface waters of the Agua Fria River. A judgment was finally rendered, granting an injunction upon certain terms set forth therein, and from said judgment this appeal has been taken.
The case is one…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Howard v. IngersollSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.