Legal Opinion

Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1931No. Civil No. 2872PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Southwest Cotton Company, a corporation, and Valley Ranch Company, a corpora tion, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought suit against Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1, a corporation, Beardsley Land & Investment Company, a corporation, and Carl Pleasant, hereinafter called defendants, for the purpose of enjoining the latter from storing and using for irrigation certain surface waters of the Agua Fria River. A judgment was finally rendered, granting an injunction upon certain terms set forth therein, and from said judgment this appeal has been taken.

The case is one…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Howard v. IngersollSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  5. City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API