Legal Opinion
Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Jenkins
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 13, 1998No. 1 CA-CV 97-0402, 1 CA-CV 98-0170PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
¶ 1 At issue in this action is the final judgment on a seven count amended complaint filed by Paloma Investment Limited Partnership (“Paloma”) against W.K. Jenkins and his family (collectively “Jenkins”) regarding a Water Rights Agreement (“WRA”). The WRA gave Jenkins a right to a portion of all proceeds gained through the sale, lease or transfer of all water or water rights on Paloma’s property, Paloma Ranch (“the Ranch”).
¶2 After both parties moved for summary judgment, the trial court found for Jenkins on the first count and dismissed the remaining six counts.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Luckel v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Strawberry Water Co. v. PaulsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Goddard v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Kimu P. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Koss Corp. v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Prairie Hills Water & Development Co. v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.