Legal Opinion

Davis v. Kleindienst

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1946No. 4870PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Judge.

Appellee, as plaintiff, instituted this action against appellants, defendants in the court below, for reformation of deed and to quiet title to a tract of ground in t^é city of Winslow. Defendants resisted the action on the ground that they were subsequent purchasers without notice and for a valuable consideration. They denied the allegations pertaining to plaintiff’s right to quiet title. Defendant Edna Davis is a party by reason of her marital relationship to her husband. The parties will he designated as plaintiff and defendant. The facts proven at the trial may he stated as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sherin v. BrackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Adams Oil & Gas Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. HicksArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Old Dominion Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Lujan v. MacMurtrieArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, Inc. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. McNeil v. AttawayArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Chantler v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API