Bristor v. Cheatham
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINDES, Justice.
The appeal is from an order of the lower court in sustaining a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint. For the original majority and minority opinions, see 73 Ariz. 228, 240 P.2d 185. The substance of the allegations of the complaint are set forth therein. Rehearing was granted. Whenever the term ground water is used herein it shall be construed to mean what is commonly called natural percolating water, and when the term majority is used reference is made to the majority original opinion.
The only questions presented by the pleadings, by the assignments of error and by the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Rothrauff Et Ux. v. Sinking Spr. W. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Morrison v. AnwayArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Irwin v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.