Rothrauff Et Ux. v. Sinking Spr. W. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stern,
Plaintiffs are the owners of a farm in Berks County upon which, until the event hereinafter mentioned, there was a deep-seated spring producing a substantial quantity of water. Defendant, a corporation engaged in the business of furnishing water to the public, entered into a written agreement with plaintiffs on January 9, 1935, by which it was to purchase the effluent of this spring for a period of ten years for the price of two and a half cents per thousand gallons, the flow to be metered in such manner that wastage or overflow from its reservoir would not be…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Forbell v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Arlotte v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Macan v. Scandinavia Belting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Wheatley v. BaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Higday v. NickolausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Bumbarger v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Estate of CreaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Jarvis v. State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.