Legal Opinion
Chesney v. United States
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided November 7, 1985No. CIV 83-1588 PCT-PGR, CIV 84-1561 PCT-CAMPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM' ORDER
ROSENBLATT, District Judge.
Overview
All defendants have filed motions for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations. There is no dispute about the applicable statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2409a, the statute permitting quiet title actions to be brought against the government, contains a 12 year statute of limitations. Subsection (f) provides;
Any civil action under this section shall be barred unless it is commenced within twelve years of the date upon which it accrued. Such action shall be deemed to have accrued on the date the plaintiff or his predecessor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Park County, Montana, and Sweet Grass County, Montana v. United States of America, Cross Creek Protective Association, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- State of California, Ex Rel., State Land Commission v. Yuba Goldfields, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Nevada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Adams v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1988
- AZ JV XII LLC v. RutledgeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. HancockDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Chatman v. FerrellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Durham v. MTC Financial IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.