Neblett v. Getty
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGrail, P. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment entered after a directed verdict. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, disregarding conflicting evidence, giving plaintiffs’ evidence all the value to which it is legally entitled, and indulging every legitimate inference which may be drawn therefrom (Mairo v. Yellow Cab Co., 208 Cal. 350 [281 Pac. 66]), the following is a statement of the case:
On April 1, 1935, Helen Ann Rork Getty, one of the defendants, hereinafter called the wife, called on plaintiffs and asked them to represent her as her attorneys in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lessing v. GibbonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ayres v. LipschutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Mairo v. Yellow Cab Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Stuart v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Echlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Marshank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Tracy v. MacIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.