Legal Opinion

Ayres v. Lipschutz

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1924No. Civ. No. 4816PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs, who were attorneys at law, with offices in the city of Reno, Nevada, entered into an oral contract with the defendant, wherein the defendant agreed to pay the plaintiffs $300 and costs for legal services to be performed by them provided they were able to secure for him a divorce from his wife by default. Two hundred dollars of this agreed price was paid and plaintiffs commenced the divorce action. While still acting as attorneys for the defendant the plaintiffs prepared and entered into a written contract with the defendant fixing their fees in the event of a contest. This…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Louque v. DejanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Parsons v. SegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Linforth v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Mitchell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API