Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Campbell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1954No. L. A. 23132PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Clyde C. Shoemaker and Byron 0. Smith for Respondent. .

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant, administratrix of the estate of Roy Campbell, deceased, in an action for attorney’s fees.

Plaintiff’s cause of action was stated in a common count alleging that Roy Campbell became indebted to him in the sum of $10,000, the reasonable value of services rendered as attorney for Campbell; that no part had been paid except $450. Campbell died after the services were rendered by plaintiff. Plaintiff filed a claim against his estate for the fees which defendant rejected. Defendant in her answer denied the allegations made and as a “further” defense…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. KinslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Chase v. GilbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Children's Hospital Central California v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API