Legal Opinion

Mairo v. Yellow Cab Co. of California

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 12520PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In this action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant’s taxicab driver, plaintiff appeals from a judgment that he take nothing. The principal question is as to the correctness of the action of the trial court in directing the jury, at the close of the evidence, to render the verdict for defendant upon which said judgment was entered. .

The court may direct a verdict only when, disregarding conflicting evidence and giving plaintiff’s evidence all the value to which it is legally entitled, indulging every legitimate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Meyer v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. California Packing Corp. v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. John Doe v. Gangland Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. San Diego Hospice v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Mintzer v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API