Echlin v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Petitioner seeks by writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court of San Mateo County to make an order substituting Robert E. Hatch as her attorney, in place of J. E. McCurdy, in a pending action for personal injuries wherein she is plaintiff. The action has not yet been brought to trial.
Subdivision 1 of section 284, Code of Civil Procedure, provides for substitution of counsel “upon the consent of both client and' attorney, filed with the clerk, or entered upon the minutes”. Subdivision 2 provides for substitution “upon the order of the court, upon the application of either client or…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Matter of WeitlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Webb v. TresconyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Roa v. Lodi Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Denio v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Oliver v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.