Legal Opinion
Marshank v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1960No. Civ. 24600; Civ. 24596PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem. *
Petitioners by separate but similar petitions apply for a writ of prohibition to prohibit respondent court from hearing an order to show cause in re attorney’s fees heretofore filed by Lester William Roth, attorney and the real party in interest, in that certain divorce action heretofore commenced in the superior court entitled “David N. Marshank, Plaintiff, vs. Beatrice Z. Marshank, Defendant,” Number S.M.D. 16971. Roth has filed a demurrer and answer to each petition.
The parties hereto are in substantial agreement as to the facts before us for consideration. On March…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Hagan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Neblett v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Weil v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Block v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Silver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Meadow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.