Legal Opinion

Tracy v. MacIntyre

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1938No. Civ. 10618PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

Respondent, as attorney for plaintiffs, commenced the above-entitled action to recover from defendant, damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by plaintiff Marion Tracy because of defendant’s negligent operation of his automobile. After the ease was at issue but before it had been set for trial. Marion Tracy, upon notice to the defendant and the respondent, moved the court for an order substituting another attorney in place of respondent upon the ground, supported by her affidavit, that he had refused her request for such substitution. In reply, by…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Matter of KrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Yazoo & M. V. R. v. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People v. J. O. Beekman & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Echlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Chambliss, Bahner and Crawford v. LutherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  5. People v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API