Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reynolds

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1885No. 8849PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

Appeal from that portion of a judgment in a • divorce suit which adjudges the payment of counsel fees. The amended pleadings were in and issues joined October 18, 1882. On the 11th of November, 1882, an order was filed which directed the defendant to show cause on the 13th of the same month why he should not pay to the attorneys for the plaintiff ■ $2,000 as counsel fees. On the said 11th of November both the parties (husband and wife) signed a paper reading thus: “ We, the parties to the above entitled action, having condoned each -other’s offenses, voluntarily abandon said action, and ask…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Hynes v. BarnesMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Neblett v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API