Legal Opinion

Swerdloff v. Rubenstein

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 17, 2004No. AC 24033PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

This appeal concerns an action for legal fees brought by the plaintiffs, Mark H. Swerdloff and Ileen P. Swerdloff, against the defendant, Jeffrey Rubenstein, their former client. The plaintiffs had been retained by the defendant to represent him in a tort action pursuant to a written fee agreement that pro*553vided, inter alia, that “[i]n the event that [the defendant] choose [s] to terminate this relationship prior to recovery by way of settlement or judgment then the Firm of Swerdloff & Swerdloff will be entitled to fees based upon quantum meruit which means that these fees will be based…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Strouth v. Pools by Murphy & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. State v. WestberryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Shapero v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. MacMillan v. HigginsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGuire v. McGuireConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. McCullough v. Waterside AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Day v. GabrieleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Urich v. FishConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API