Swerdloff v. Rubenstein
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
This appeal concerns an action for legal fees brought by the plaintiffs, Mark H. Swerdloff and Ileen P. Swerdloff, against the defendant, Jeffrey Rubenstein, their former client. The plaintiffs had been retained by the defendant to represent him in a tort action pursuant to a written fee agreement that pro*553vided, inter alia, that “[i]n the event that [the defendant] choose [s] to terminate this relationship prior to recovery by way of settlement or judgment then the Firm of Swerdloff & Swerdloff will be entitled to fees based upon quantum meruit which means that these fees will be based…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Strouth v. Pools by Murphy & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. WestberryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Shapero v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- MacMillan v. HigginsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- McGuire v. McGuireConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- McCullough v. Waterside AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Day v. GabrieleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Urich v. FishConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006