Legal Opinion
Strouth v. Pools by Murphy & Sons, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 26, 2003No. AC 22245PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
In this breach of contract action, the defendant Pools by Murphy and Sons, Inc.,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiffs, Robert Strouth and Caroline Strouth. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) determined that the construction of a kidney shaped swimming pool constituted a material breach of the parties’ contract and (2) failed to award restitution. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court found the following facts that are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Bernstein v. NemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- 669 Atlantic Street Associates v. Atlantic-Rockland Stamford AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- De La Concha of Hartford, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Shah v. Cover-It, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Efthimiou v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Menon v. DuxConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- A.S. & W.S. v. Trumbull Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.