Legal Opinion
Urich v. Fish
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 3, 2006No. AC 26125PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Mark S. Urich, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the defendant, Richard Fish, on the defendant’s counterclaim. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly awarded the defendant (1) punitive damages and attorney’s fees under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., 1 and (2) prejudgment interest pursuant to General Statutes § 37-3a. 2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northrop v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Urich v. FishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Ceci Bros. v. Five Twenty-One Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Urich v. FishConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Swerdloff v. RubensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Urich v. FishConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Martin v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Urich v. FishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007