McCullough v. Waterside Associates
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether an attorney should recover fees under a written contingency fee agreement where the trial court determines that the attorney’s performance was less than exemplary. We conclude that, under the facts and circumstances of this case, the plaintiff, Paul L. McCullough, was not precluded from recovering under the terms of the agreement a reasonable fee for services he had rendered on behalf of the defendant Waterside Associates and its two defendant partners. The defendants also claim that the court improperly awarded offer of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Cecio Bros., Inc. v. FeldmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- O'Hara v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- David M. Somers & Associates, P.C. v. BuschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Jennings v. Town of StratfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- The Law Firm of Thomas A. Tarro, III v. Maria ChecrallahSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Horner v. BagnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Urich v. FishConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.