Legal Opinion
MacMillan v. Higgins
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 15, 2003No. AC 22390PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiff Kevin F. MacMillan1 appeals, and the defendants Harrison Scott Higgins and *263Linda Park Higgins2 cross appeal, from the judgment of the trial court, adopting the findings and recommendations of the attorney trial referee (referee) in this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly accepted the findings of the referee (1) that the defendants did not act in bad faith during their dealings with the plaintiff and (2) that the contract between the parties was not in practical compliance with General Statutes § 20-418 et…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doe v. RapoportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Scrivani v. VallombrosoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Gaynor v. Hi-Tech HomesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Burns v. AdlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Robichaud v. Hewlett Packard Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.