Legal Opinion
Day v. Gabriele
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 22, 2007No. AC 26979PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendants, Joseph Gabriele and Victoria Gabriele, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiff, Eva Day. The defendants claim that the court improperly (1) concluded that the evidence supported a finding that their actions constituted a trespass and a nuisance, (2) calculated the amount of compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiff and (3) assessed punitive damages against Victoria Gabriele. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
From the evidence presented at trial, the court reasonably could have…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Rizzuto v. Davidson Ladders, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Ferri v. Pyramid Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Stohlts v. GilkinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burns v. Quinnipiac UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Boyne v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Chase v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Ray Weiner, LLC v. ConneryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Day v. GabrieleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.