Legal Opinion

Briggs v. McWeeny

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 21, 2002No. SC 16515PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

This case is before us on a writ of error brought by the plaintiff in error, Carole W. Briggs (plaintiff), an attorney. The plaintiff claims that the defendant in error, Honorable Robert F. McWeeny,1 improperly found, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence, that the plaintiff had violated subdivisions (1) and (6) of rule 3.42 of the Rules *299of Professional Conduct3 and that the trial court’s imposition of a sanction upon the plaintiff violated her due process rights under the state and federal constitutions. The plaintiff seeks reversal of the trial court’s findings…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bhatia v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API