Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

City of Tucson v. Consumers for Retail Choice

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 25, 2000No. 2 CA-CV 00-0035PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

¶ 1 The City of Tucson, a charter city, filed a declaratory judgment action1 to clarify the validity and constitutionality of its referendum ordinances, which impose requirements on the content and circulation of Tucson referendum petitions in addition to those imposed by our state referendum statutes. Hal Personius and Consumers For Retail Choice Sponsored by Wal-Mart (collectively CFRC) filed a special action against Kathleen De-trick and the City of Tucson, seeking mandamus relief requiring Tucson to accept and process CFRC’s referendum petition and seeking a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyArizona Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Garcia v. BrowningArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of Casa Grande v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. McMann v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. Hause v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API