Legal Opinion

City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 25, 2001No. 1 CA-CV-00-0242PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 The City of Tempe appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing the City’s complaint against Outdoor Systems, Inc. (OSI), Aaron Rents, Inc., and Newport Associates, Inc. (collectively the Defendants). The City’s complaint alleged that OSI violated Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 9-462.02 (Supp.2000) and Tempe Zoning Ordinance No. 808 (1986) when it altered a billboard. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The facts are not in dispute. In 1983, the City issued a sign permit to erect a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. PrentissArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Estate of Hernandez v. FlavioArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Goodman v. Samaritan Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Miller v. HehlenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Dreamland Villa Community Club, Inc. v. RaimeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API