Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Continental Insurance
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1994No. CV-92-0199-PRPublishedCited by 261 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Chief Justice.
This case turns on the interpretation of AR.S. § 23-930, a statute regulating bad faith claims asserted against workers’ compensation carriers. We granted review in this case, and in the companion cases of Doskocz v. Birmingham Fire Ins. Co., No. CV-92-0238-PR, and Ring v. State Compensation Fund, No. CV-92-0256-PR, to determine how AR.S. § 23-930 should be applied and whether it violates our constitution. These are questions of first impression and statewide importance. See Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 23(c)(4). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3),…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edwards v. AguillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by261 opinions
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.