Legal Opinion

Jett v. City of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1994No. CV-94-0042-T/APPublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

We are asked to determine whether a city council, acting under the authority provided by its city charter, may remove a magistrate from office for judicial misconduct. Because this issue affects numerous cities and towns in this state, we granted the court of appeals’ petition to transfer the case to this court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to rule 19(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Rita Jett had served as a magistrate for the City of Tucson for more than 8 years when she was reappointed in March 1993 for her third…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ruth v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. PrentissArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API