Legal Opinion

McMann v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 30, 2002No. 2 CA-CV 2001-0082, 2 CA-CV 2001-0163PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 These consolidated appeals arise from the trial courts’ rulings on Pat and Joan McMann’s declaratory judgment actions in cause numbers C-20011696 (first case) and C-20012065 (second case). In both cases, the McManns sought a declaration that A.R.S. § 13-3108 preempts the City of Tucson’s “ordinance” 1 requiring instant background cheeks for prospective gun purchasers during gun shows held at the Tucson Convention Center (TCC). The trial court dismissed the first case without prejudice, concluding that the McManns had failed to present a justiciable case or…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Posadas De Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co. of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Great Western Shows, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
  2. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  3. City of Scottsdale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. STATE EX REL. BRANNAN v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. 1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API