Legal Opinion

Hause v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 8, 2001No. 2 CA-CV 00-0059PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Shortly after appellee City of Tucson (the City) passed an ordinance regulating large retail businesses, it issued building permits to appellee Wal-Mart Stores for a store that did not comply with the ordinance. Plaintiffs/appellants Janice Hause and Fernando Feyron (collectively, Hause) filed a lawsuit claiming the permits were invalid because the ordinance was in effect when they were issued. The trial court denied Hause’s request for special action relief. We affirm because the building permits were issued before the ordinance became effective and,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. City of Phoenix v. Leroy's Liquors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Galloway v. VanderpoolArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L. C. v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Fidelity National Title Co. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Volunteer Center of So. Az. v. Staples, Ford, Pima Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API