Legal Opinion
Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1991No. CV-91-0116-APPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff Western Devcor (Owner 1 ) challenged the sufficiency of referendum petitions and appeals the trial court’s judgment upholding the validity of the petitions and permitting a referendum election. We have jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. §§ 19-122(C), 19-121.03, and 19-141(C). 2
FACTS
On December 4,1990, the Scottsdale City Council unanimously approved the rezoning of Owner’s property at the corner of Pima Road and Shea Boulevard, On January 11, 1991, Intervenors 3 filed referendum petitions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Direct Sellers Association v. McBrayerArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Kromko v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Flagstaff v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Herbst Gaming, Inc. v. Sec'y of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Committee for Preservation of Established Neighborhoods v. RiffelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Wennerstrom v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Forszt v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.