Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. St. Mary's Medical Center

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1997No. A075722PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALKER, J.

This case presents the issue whether an employee’s action against her employer for injuries sustained as the result of a “slip and fall” while on the employer’s premises in the course of treatment for a prior work-related injury is barred by the provisions of the Labor Code establishing workers’ compensation as the exclusive remedy for her recovery (Lab. Code, §§ 3600-3603); 1 or whether the employer may be held liable based upon the common law duty of a landowner to an invitee to exercise reasonable care in maintaining premises to avoid exposing persons to an unreasonable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Jambazian v. BordenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. King v. CompPartners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. KirsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Montgomery v. Cal Accountants Mutual Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Montgomery v. Cal Accountants Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API