Legal Opinion

Duprey v. Shane

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1952No. S. F. 18614PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In this malpractice action defendants appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor. Defendants’ chief contention is that because plaintiff was an employee of defendants Shane at the time she was injured, she may not recover damages in this action at law but may only receive compensation in a proceeding before the Industrial Accident Commission under the workmen’s compensation laws of this state. (See Lab. Code, § 3601.) A hearing was granted by this court, after decision by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One, for the purpose…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rideaux v. TorgrimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API