Legal Opinion

Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1981No. L.A. No. 31362PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STANIFORTH, J.*

Appellant William Bell was employed by respondent Industrial Vangas, Inc. (Vangas), as a route salesman. He was severely injured in a fire which occurred when he delivered a flammable gas to the premises of a customer—Long Chemical, Inc.

Bell brought suit, charging Vangas and Long Chemical, Inc., and others as joint tortfeasors with strict “manufacturer’s” liability as that term has been defined in California products liability law. (See Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963) 59 Cal.2d 57, 63 [27 Cal. Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897, 13 A.L.R.3d 1049]; Vandermark v. Ford Mo*271t…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Fermino v. Fedco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API