Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Cal Accountants Mutual Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1998No. B107899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPENCER, P. J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Belfa Kay Montgomery appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Cal Accountants Mutual Insurance Company. We affirm.

Statement of Facts

In September 1987, Brett Cleaver (Cleaver) and Michael Beck (Beck) asked plaintiff to become a partner in their accounting firm. Plaintiff was hesitant to do so: She had given up accounting some years before; she had allowed her license as a certified public accountant to lapse. She was nonetheless intrigued by the prospect of becoming a partner in the firm. They discussed buy-in amount and compensation,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Tresemer v. BarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montgomery v. Cal Accountants Mutual Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API