Legal Opinion
Union Bank v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 12, 1995No. B085357PublishedCited by 173 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
Defendant, Union Bank, seeks a writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, 1 subdivision (/), compelling the respondent court to enter a summary judgment on the first amended complaint against plaintiffs who are 11 individuals, a trust, and an individual retirement account. We conclude that: defendant could rely on plaintiffs’ Judicial Council form interrogatory answers as an evidentiary basis for its separate statement; despite a request for such information, the interrogatory answers contained no evidence to support a theory of…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Patricia Ann Fairbank,plaintiff-Appellant v. Wunderman Cato Johnson, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.