Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Cal Accountants Mutual Ins. Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1998No. B107899PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
61 Cal.App.4th 854 (1998)
BELFA KAY MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CAL ACCOUNTANTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.
Docket No. B107899.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.
January 30, 1998.
COUNSEL
Ira Jacoves for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Kolod, Wager & Gordon, Scott M. Kolod, Jerome A. Wager and Laleaque Grad for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
SPENCER, P.J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Belfa Kay Montgomery appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Cal Accountants Mutual Insurance Company. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
In September 1987,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Tresemer v. BarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neverkovec v. FredericksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- American Medical International, Inc.,plaintiff-Appellee v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Gemini Insurance v. Delos InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Neverkovec v. FredericksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999