Legal Opinion

Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. Kirson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 8, 2000No. 2, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

Maryland Code (1991), Title 9 of the Labor and Employment Article (LE) is the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act). LE § 9-509 in part provides:

“(a) Employers. — Except as otherwise provided in this title, the liability of an employer under this title is exclusive.
“(b) Covered employees and dependents.- — Except as otherwise provided in this title, the compensation provided under this title to a covered employee or the dependents of a covered employee is in place of any right of action against any person.”

We granted certiorari in this action primarily to determine…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries and Ingersoll-Rand CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Hauch v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Board of Education v. Marks-SloanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Giant Food, Inc. v. BookerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Taha v. Southern Management CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Hiob v. Progressive American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API