Legal Opinion

Jambazian v. Borden

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1994No. B077655PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.—

I. Introduction

Plaintiff, Harry Jambazian, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant, Joseph Borden, D.P.M., on a complaint for medical malpractice. We conclude plaintiffs failure to present legally admissible opinion testimony to controvert that submitted by defendant warranted summary judgment be granted on the medical negligence and informed consent claims. In so concluding, we determine that plaintiff had a responsibility to present opinion testimony that he suffered from diabetes by a properly qualified medical witness in his summary judgment opposition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Truman v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Arato v. AvedonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Smith v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API