Legal Opinion
In the Matter of John Ruffalo, Jr
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1966No. 269_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
Upon the Supreme Court of Ohio’s cer-. tification to us that respondent John RuffaTo7 Jr., had been indefinitely suspended from the practice of’law, we ordered that “John Ruffalo, Jr., show cause if any he has, on or before May Í2, 1965, why he should not be stricken from the roll of counsel of this Court.”
After extensions granted at the request of respondent, we received his response and brief, as well as a brief amicus curiae by the Ohio State Bar Association in support of the Ohio Supreme Court’s order, and the cause has now been argued to a panel of this Court.
In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. McCallumIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Dombey, Tyler, Richards & Grieser v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re SlatteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Committee on Professional Ethics and Grievances of the Virgin Islands Bar Association v. Russell B. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.