Legal Opinion

Selling v. Radford

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1917No. 21PublishedCited by 233 opinions

PETITION TO DISBAR. The facts are stated in the opinión. The Solicitor General on behalf of the petitioners.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

George W. Radford was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan on the fifteenth day of June, 1876. About ten years thereafter, on March 18, 1886, upon the representation that he had been for the three years preceding a member of the Bar of the highest court of the State of Michigan and upon the further assurance, both conformably with Rule 2 of this court, that his private and professional character appeared to be fair, he was permitted to become a member of the Bar of this court.

Represented by the Solicitor General of the United States, the petitioners as a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte TillinghastSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

3Cited by233 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Frazier v. HeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API