Legal Opinion
In Re Ruffalo
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 27, 1968No. 73PublishedCited by 957 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Petitioner was ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Ohio on two findings of alleged misconduct. Mahoning County Bar Assn. v. Ruffalo, 176 Ohio St. 263, 199 N. E. 2d 396. That order became final and is not here on review. The Federal District Court, after ordering petitioner to show cause why he should not be disbarred, found that there was no misconduct. In re Ruffalo, 249 F. Supp. 432 (D. C. N. D. Ohio). The Court of Appeals likewise ordered petitioner to show cause why he should not be stricken from the roll of that court on the basis of Ohio’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by957 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
952 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.