Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Selling
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 6, 1917No. 21, OriginalPublishedCited by 187 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
243 U.S. 46 (1917)
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF SELLING ET AL.,
A SPECIAL COMMITTEE APPOINTED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF DETROIT,
v.
RADFORD.
No. 21, Original.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted November 20, 1916.
Order made March 6, 1917.
PETITION TO DISBAR.
The Solicitor General on behalf of the petitioners.
Mr. Thomas A.E. Weadock and Mr. Harrison Geer for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · WhiteChief Justice White
George W. Radford was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan on the fifteenth day of June, 1876. About ten years thereafter, on March 18, 1886, upon the representation that he had…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Ex Parte TillinghastSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
4Cited by187 opinions
- Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- In Re CookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- In Re: Robert B. SurrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Nick C. Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corporation, Theatre & Cinema, Inc., Philhamboro, Inc., Youngstown Theatre Corporation and Modern Playhouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- In the Matter of Arthur Lawrence Abrams, an Attorney-At-LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.