Legal Opinion
Dombey, Tyler, Richards & Grieser v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 30, 1965No. 15787_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellees, Dombey, Tyler, Richards & Grieser, a Columbus, Ohio, law firm, recovered a $12,500 judgment against the appellant Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad as their contingent fee under a representation contract with an injured railroad workman, one Craig. Whatever services these attorneys provided Craig were performed between November 14 and November 17, 1960, and consisted of the interview with Craig on November 14th at which they obtained the contingent contract, the opening of a file on the matter and one or two telephone calls to Craig on November…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Ex Rel. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- In Re HeirichIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Wilkinson v. PoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fox & Assocs. Co. v. PurdonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Leasing Service Corp. v. Diamond Timber, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Roberts v. HuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re WallerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Katopodis v. Liberian S/T Olympic SunDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.