Legal Opinion
Halla Nursery, Inc. v. City of Chanhassen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 6, 2010No. A08-233PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
Appellants Donald and Sandra Halla own real -property in the City of Chanhas-sen that they lease to appellant Halla Nursery, Inc. (collectively “Halla”). At issue is the interpretation of a 1997 stipulation and judgment between Halla and respondent City of Chanhassen concerning an illuminated sign at Halla’s nursery and the application of the vested rights doc trine. The district court allowed Halla to continue using the illuminated sign, concluding that Halla had obtained vested rights to use the sign. The court of appeals reversed. The court concluded that the sign did…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Marzullo v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- General Mills Operations, LLC v. Five Star Custom Foods, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- City of North Oaks v. SarpalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Savela v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining MaoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.