Legal Opinion
City of North Oaks v. Sarpal
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 11, 2011No. A09-1961PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
Appellant City of North Oaks commenced an action in Ramsey County District Court against respondents Dr. Rajbir S. Sarpal and his wife, Dr. Carol L. Sar-pal, alleging that the Sarpals’ newly-constructed shed violates a zoning ordinance establishing a side yard setback, and also encroaches upon a trail easement. The Sarpals raised the affirmative defense of equitable estoppel, alleging that their reliance on a misrepresentation by a City employee, and the City’s approval of the permit they prepared in reliance on that misrepresentation bars the City from…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor MouaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.