Legal Opinion
Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 2009No. A06-2227PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Respondent Valspar Refinish, Inc. (Valspar) commenced this action to recov er damages arising out of an alleged breach by Gaylord’s, Inc. (Gaylord’s) of the parties’ refinish-coat supply agreement. Gaylord’s denied the claim and asserted numerous counterclaims. Following a hearing, the Hennepin County District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Valspar, dismissed Gay-lord’s counterclaims, and awarded Vals-par damages, concluding that Gaylord’s breached the parties’ refinish-coat supply agreement. The court of appeals affirmed and concluded, among other things,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Wisconsin Knife Works v. National Metal CraftersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Bruce Munro v. Lucy Activewear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Cpi Card Grp., Inc. v. John Dwyer, Multi Packaging Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2017
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.