Legal Opinion

Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 26, 2012No. A10-2173PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

The issue before us is whether appellants, who were employees of a contractor *830that performed work pursuant to a municipal contract with the City of Minneapolis (City), may recover for the contractor’s alleged breach of a prevailing wage provision in the contract. Appellants Oscar Caldas, et al., were employed by respondent Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. (AGS), to perform work at the Minneapolis Convention Center pursuant to a contract between AGS and the City. After completion of the project, appellants brought this action against AGS, alleging (1) that AGS failed to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Universities Research Assn., Inc. v. CoutuSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Astra USA, Inc. v. Santa Clara CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Jeff Knutson v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Knotts v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
  5. Jesse Ventura v. Taya KyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API