Legal Opinion

Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining Mao

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 8, 2014No. A12-1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

An arbitrator issued an award against appellants Sining Mao, Western Digital Corporation, and Western Digital Technologies, Inc., in an amount exceeding $500 million. The award was vacated in part by the district court and then reinstated by the court of appeals. Mao and the Western Digital entities now separately seek review of the reinstatement decision. Mao and Western Digital argue that the arbitrator’s punitive sanctions, which precluded any evidence or defense and en*754tered a judgment of liability on certain claims, must be vacated under Minn.Stat. § 572.19, subd.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. 328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Gen. Mills, Inc. v. Comm'r RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Minnesota Vikings Football Stadium, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
  4. Daniel L. Berglund, Relator v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. In the Matter of: Jon AmbersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API